so it depends on their appeals structure I suspect.
If they have (let’s say) 50 appeals, 10 are successful, and they have 10 places that’s easy: all 10 get in.
If they have 50 appeals, 10 are successful and only 5 places left, that’s more tricky.
I expect there is some kind of appeals policy dictating how they prioritise the appeals, and it may be related to where the child would have fallen on the original admissions criteria were they originally successful. It would make sense for it to follow this structure as a child with an appeal shouldn’t come above a child already on the waiting lost just because they have won an appeal?
If they have (let’s say) 50 appeals, 10 are successful, and they have 10 places that’s easy: all 10 get in.
If they have 50 appeals, 10 are successful and only 5 places left, that’s more tricky.
I expect there is some kind of appeals policy dictating how they prioritise the appeals, and it may be related to where the child would have fallen on the original admissions criteria were they originally successful. It would make sense for it to follow this structure as a child with an appeal shouldn’t come above a child already on the waiting lost just because they have won an appeal?
Statistics: Posted by Aethel — Tue May 21, 2024 7:48 pm